Sunday, December 7, 2008
Nature
Thursday, December 4, 2008
Emersonian Friendship
Gifts
Emerson has a lot to say about gifts. Reading over this essay, entitled Gifts, a certain thought struck me. The first time I read through the essay I simply assumed Emerson was talking about tangible gifts. But after reading it through a second time I realized that he could also mean gifts that our intangible such as love and kindness, so that is something we must take into account when reading the Gifts essay.
According to Emerson gifts should be given without expecting anything in return. They should be given from the heart, out of your true “giving spirit”, not because they gave you a gift and you feel in debt to them.
This concept got me thinking…what did Emerson think about birthday gifts? In essence, birthday gifts sort of have to be given or else in today’s society you are seen as rude or stingy even. And most of the time, regardless of if the person you are giving the birthday gift to gave you one or not, you usually give birthday gifts! So I wonder what Emerson would think of this. It is a tradition, but it kind of breaks his ideal model of gift giving.
Anyways, back to how gifts should be giving. The only gifts that our given should be those that are a necessity. Emerson poses the question, what good is it to give a man that needs shoes a paint box.
We should also give gifts that represent a portion of ourselves. If we give someone a ring, than it is really giving that person the gift of the jeweler, not the gift of you own work. This idea also contradicts the theory of necessary gifts, because back to the first example, with the man that needed shoes, if you yourself aren’t a shoemaker than is it wrong to by him a pair of shoes, because they are the work of the shoemaker not of yourself? Perhaps what Emerson is saying is that unnecessary gifts, if given, should be of your own work, and with necessary gifts its allowable to purchase gifts that have been created because of the work of someone else.
Gifts should be received without emotion, because according to Emerson, some violence is done when you rejoice or grieve over a gift. If you grieve over a gift, it is insulting because the giver does not know your true spirit. And if you rejoice over a gift, you are showing that you love the gift more than the giver. This leaves us in a predicament because Emerson doesn’t really leave us with a correct way to receive gifts, he only instructs us not to grieve nor rejoice, which would leave us with no emotion, since all emotions stem from those two.
Emerson brings up interesting social commentary in his essay Gifts. I think the main point he is trying to get across here is that gifts should be given from the heart, and when received should be seen as the effort and thought behind the gift rather than the actual gift itself.
The best “Emersonian” gift I ever received was a rock with “better rock” written in sloppy kindergartener handwriting on it. My brother gave it to me when I was sick, and I told him it would be cool if there were a rock you could hold when you were sick that would make you better. Sure enough, with in 10 minutes, I had my own, unique, meaningful healing rock. The gift was hand-made, connective, and necessary, really fitting in Emerson’s guidelines. This silly little rock now, is something I cherish more than most any other store-bought gift I have ever received.
Monday, November 24, 2008
"Self-Reliance"

"What I must do, is all that concerns me, not what the people think."
This quote is so simple, and straightforward. Emerson didn't use any elaborate words, or try and make it a mind twister that we have to analyze and come up with crazy parallels for it to make sense. And that is why I like this quote. And that is why I choose it. Out of all the knowledgeable and thought-provoking quotes he provided us with, this one is my favorite.
It seems so simple. To do what concerns you and not to worry what people think...but it is much easier said than done and I am almost 100 percent sure that anyone reading this can attest. We all strive to be that person that doesn't care what any one else is thinking, and who isn't worried about what they look like, or what they are doing, or what kind of impression they are leaving. But the truth is, I think for almost everyone out there, no matter how hard we try not to concern ourselves with what other people think, we're still worried about it.
I think Ralph Waldo Emerson was one of the very few people, who wasn't concerned and caught up in what other people were thinking of him. He left behind hundreds of pages of his own thoughts, for other people to read and criticize, and honestly, I don't think he could care less of what other people thought about his writings. One of his quotes that perfectly exemplifies this is, "Nothing is at last sacred but the integrity of your own mind." Emerson had a passion. His passion was to write what he thought, and to end up getting some people that loved him, and also getting some that hated him and thought he was wrong. But he was happy with his work, and to him that was the only thing that mattered.
The concept of doing what I want, and not what other people want is thought-provoking to me. How many times in my life have i been truly proud of something i accomplished? Certainly more than I can count on one hand, but when I think back about those times, all those times when I was truly happy about what i had accomplished, they were times when i did something just for the sake of doing it, and doing it for me, and no body else.